LLMs’ impact on science: Booming publications, stagnating quality

via arstechnica.com

Short excerpt below. Read at the original source.

There have been a number of high-profile cases where scientific papers have had to be retracted because they were filled with AI-generated slop—the most recent coming just two weeks ago. These instances raise serious questions about the quality of peer review in some journals—how could anyone let a figure with terms like “runctitional,” “fexcectorn,” and […]

Read at Source